Pages

Monday 28 May 2012

You are what you're made to wear, yeah?

Much is being (has been, perhaps, because in Malta something is mentioned then it duly disappears) said regarding changes in school uniforms. It's a story that never dies: who gets the supplying contract, the ridiculous expense, what accessories must be worn; the list goes on and on. It's an extra burden on frustrated parents and a very stressful inconvenience for children who have to report back to their parents every time the headmistress reprimands them about their socks being a shade too dark or their hair ribbon being too thick. We're not joking - our school days are not that far behind us and we remember these sad incidents very vividly.

What we can't really understand is not quite why they are thinking of opting for "a generic uniform" - that is really beside our point. What we hated back then and still can't get our heads round is: why do children have to wear uniforms? OK, we know the cliché reasons given by everyone - but to be quite honest, we think they're lame.

Reason 1: It is convenient for children not to have to worry about what to wear for school in the morning. Yeah, that's exactly what's stressing children out nowadays - choosing outfits everyday. And before you say that it's extra work for the parents - allowing children to select their daily outfits may strengthen their decision-making skills and give them a sense of responsibility. Sometimes parents, especially Maltese ones, tend to be over-bearing. Our advice to these parents (lest we're accused of complaining without suggesting anything) would be: Back Off! (Well, if you then see that the outfit they have picked is not adequate, you could easily teach them a thing or two about what's good and not - or is that too much of a burden, too?)

Reason 2: Uniforms protect the unwealthy who can't afford 'cool' or designer clothing. Firstly, 'cool' clothing can be found at a very cheap price nowadays - no, not necessarily at the market (even though we hear that it's terribly improved, and technically, let's-buy-cool-clothes-for-a-song has become the latest trend!). Secondly, if it were to arise, this problem wouldn't surface before secondary school - at which age, if used to wearing regular clothes to school, adolescents will have learnt that clothing isn't quite everything - yes, the earlier you get accustomed to something the earlier you start to disregard it. Moreover, clothes is certainly not the first thing that sets the 'wealthy' and the 'not-so-wealthy' apart. Smartphones, tablets, handheld 'video' games... the list goes on and on. You get our drift.
                    Besides, this kind of reasoning that unfortunately plagues the island holds no water, really. In reality the same people that you dearly want to protect in schools (that's the pretext many use anyway) will eventually also see each other outside that very safe environment. Yes, they will meet outside - and there too can be discriminated against... but then, you know, the next day at school all of that will be forgotten. That wouldn't happen, though, if such a fuss wasn't made about clothing.

Reason 3: Wearing a uniform makes children more disciplined. We hate to burst your bubble, but forcing children and teens into a uniform won't make them more disciplined. That uniform isn't helping much against, say, bullying, is it? And that's merely to give an example. The reasons are two-fold:

A. It is education (and parenthood) that will instill a sense of discipline in children. Also, enforcing a dress-code may nudge children into being disciplined while they maintain their individuality. Forcing them into a uniform will only make them resent any type of conformity, which leads us to our next point;

B: Chances are that the more children are forced into doing things, the more rebellious they will turn out to be. Cases in point are Maltese children. Ever noticed their euphoric use of the trashiest clothes they can get their hands on when they get the chance to wear what they want? How about the Christmas parties that schools hold ever year? Or the so-called "Casual days"? You will probably have noticed that on such days children try to impress one another (usually with their parents' blessing), hence their dressing up to the nines for a 'casual' day. This, albeit you may laugh at it, is indicative of what will happen in the years to come. If you still think this is baloney, then we suggest you pay Paceville a visit. The more you ban something, the more they'll want it; crave it. The sooner people realise this, the better. Really.

So please, save everyone the hassle and do away with these awful uniforms. They're not helping in any way and making uniforms 'generic' across the board might - (we don't think so) - solve a couple of problems but will give rise to an array of new ones, too.

7 comments:

  1. Can't you morons see that this will put parents in unneeded stress? Please come on.

    ReplyDelete
  2. In Belgium we don't have any uniforms and because this we don't have discrimination because clothes become the normal thing in your life. You don't think of them you know what I mean? Infact only private schools have uniforms and the students hate them because they feel as like they are pushed down and have no voice in this question.

    ReplyDelete
  3. In malta you have uniforms? Why you have them? In switzerland it's funny to think of uniforms.

    ReplyDelete
  4. The Belgian public schools don't demand that students wear uniforms. and I find it quite good because even in schools without uniforms... the students have all the similar clothes ... because the young people dress the same way. Moreover, the uniform is supposed to unify students While in reality, it only differentiates the schools. & in Belgium only girls are affected by this issue... I think that It's principally a question of standing .....

    ReplyDelete
  5. Do you know the expense to buy those uniforms? It's so expensive and what's so bad about it is that the uniforms change every so often so if your son is in form5 you can't be sure to give it to your son who is in form2 because they will include some new line which is totally unnecessary.

    ReplyDelete
  6. I agree with Uniforms until form 5, partly because the kids look smart and are easy to identify on school outings, for instance. Also, it can be a headache to choose an outfit for school every single day. What I totally disagree with is the monopoly held over the selling of uniforms - ridiculously expensive in some cases, for substandard quality.

    ReplyDelete
  7. i agree with some of you here, i like uniforms, they give kids a clean and smart look, even when guys wear the tie round their head like a bandana and have their shirt off and round their waist or girls revealing their mid drift by knotting the shirt up and rolling the skirt up to lilliput proportions to walk back home 'ghax cool' ma nafx but i don't think kids would ever do this to their everyday clothes i think locking in rest rooms and whipping the hand should be reintroduced.

    ReplyDelete